The BLUF - February 4th

Good morning everyone,

This is Atlas, and you’re reading the Bottom Line Up Front, where we cover the top geopolitical stories from around the world every Tuesday!

Today’s topics:

• China’s New AI Threat, and How It Affects US National Security

• Germany Passes Legislation On Immigration Crackdown

• US Envoy Meets Venezuelan Leaders, But Still Recognize Opposition Leader As Legitimately Elected

We got hundreds of emails, and we just dropped some merch after you all asked us to restock. All profits go directly to the LA Fire Dept Foundation.
You can get it at our shop here.

Deep Threat

_{By Ciaran Brownlee, Geopolitical Analyst & Residing Fellow at Atlas}

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, DeepSeek's meteoric rise has sent heavy waves through the American tech industry and the US national security apparatus. Founded in 2023 by Liang Wenfeng, this Chinese AI startup has managed to accomplish what many thought impossible: developing a 671 billion parameter AI model at a fraction of the cost of its Western counterparts. Implications of this technological leap extend far beyond mere market competition, raising serious concerns about national security, intellectual property theft, and the effectiveness of U.S. export controls.

Circumventing Export Controls: A Troubling Pattern

Perhaps most alarming is DeepSeek's reported acquisition and use of 2,048 Nvidia H800 chips—hardware explicitly restricted from sale to Chinese firms by U.S. government regulations. Federal investigators have uncovered evidence suggesting DeepSeek obtained these chips through intermediaries in Singapore, exploiting a common loophole in trade restrictions. This pattern mirrors previous instances of sanctions evasion, reminiscent of how Russian entities acquired restricted technology through shell companies in India.

The situation has become so concerning that Howard Lutnick, during his Commerce Department confirmation hearing, explicitly addressed the issue: "Nvidia's chips, which they bought tons of, and they found their ways around it, drive their DeepSeek model. It's got to end. If they are going to compete with us, let them compete, but stop using our tools to compete with us."

Pentagon Security Breach and Military Implications

The national security implications became starkly apparent when Bloomberg reported that Department of Defense employees had connected their work computers to Chinese servers while accessing DeepSeek's AI chatbot. This security breach persisted for multiple days before the Pentagon intervened, highlighting the potential for sensitive information exposure. The incident prompted immediate action across military branches, with the Navy explicitly prohibiting DeepSeek's use and the Air Force maintaining its restriction on commercial generative AI systems for sensitive information.

The scope of this security breach remains unclear, as defense officials continue to assess how many employees accessed DeepSeek's system through web browsers. More troubling still is the revelation that military personnel had been downloading DeepSeek code onto their workstations since fall 2024, initially undetected because the Chinese connection wasn't immediately apparent to security teams.

Intellectual Property Concerns and Economic Security

Adding another layer to these security concerns is the alleged intellectual property theft through model distillation. David Sacks, the White House's AI and crypto czar, has presented "substantial evidence" that DeepSeek extracted knowledge from OpenAI's models—a practice that violates OpenAI's terms of service and represents a significant threat to U.S. technological advantages. OpenAI and Microsoft have both confirmed finding evidence of these violations, suggesting a systematic effort to leverage American innovation for Chinese advancement.

The economic implications of this technological transfer cannot be understated. DeepSeek claims to have developed its model for approximately $5.5 million, compared to the hundreds of billions invested by U.S. companies. If achieved through legitimate means, this cost differential would represent a significant competitive advantage. However, the evidence increasingly suggests that this efficiency stems from unauthorized access to American intellectual property and restricted hardware.

Censorship and Data Privacy: Hidden Dangers

Beyond the immediate security concerns, DeepSeek's AI models operate under Beijing's regulatory framework, introducing built-in censorship and bias. Reports indicate the model refuses to provide information about sensitive topics like the Tiananmen Square massacre, raising questions about information control and manipulation. This censorship capability, combined with DeepSeek's data storage practices on Chinese servers under Chinese law, presents a concerning vector for influence operations and information control.

Italy's decision to block DeepSeek from processing its citizens' data after the company declined to cooperate with information requests exemplifies the growing international concern over data privacy and sovereignty. This development suggests a pattern of opacity that could mask more serious security implications.

Strategic Implications for U.S. National Security

The convergence of these factors—export control evasion, military security breaches, intellectual property theft, and data privacy concerns—presents a clear and present danger to U.S. national security interests. If AI dominance shifts to China, there are legitimate concerns about its potential military and cybersecurity applications without the checks and balances present in Western democracies.

The situation threatens not just technological leadership but also the broader strategic balance. A shift of AI industry leadership away from Silicon Valley could lead to global reliance on Chinese AI technology, introducing vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, military systems, and intelligence capabilities. The embedded censorship and bias in these systems could subtly influence decision-making processes and information access across various sectors.

Looking Forward

The DeepSeek situation serves as a wake-up call for U.S. national security policy. It demonstrates the urgent need for more robust export controls, tighter enforcement mechanisms, and enhanced cybersecurity protocols across government institutions. The incident also highlights the importance of maintaining technological leadership while protecting intellectual property and sensitive information.

The DeepSeek challenge represents more than just market competition—it's a testament to the complex interplay between technological advancement, national security, and international relations in the AI era. As this situation continues to unfold, it serves as a crucial reminder that maintaining technological superiority requires not just innovation but also vigilant protection of our advances and infrastructure.

The emergence of DeepSeek as a potential threat to U.S. national security underscores the need for a comprehensive and coordinated response across government, military, and private sector stakeholders. Only through such unified action can the United States effectively address the multifaceted challenges posed by rapidly advancing AI capabilities in the hands of strategic competitors.

Subscribe to the BLUF to read the rest.